Jan 31, 2008 Comments
Enjoying the snow…snow…sno…
Enjoying the snow…snow…snow..snow…
Jan 22, 2008 Comments
I just wrote my first article for the Jesus Manifesto. It comes from spending time in Hosea this weekend…
Jan 16, 2008 Comments
Yesterday some friends called asking if I wanted to join them for Atonement, one of the movies currently out. I quickly agreed since this movie has been on my radar since late last summer when reviews started popping up on various sites I respect. Thankfully, it did not disappoint. I’ll try to be broad in the rest of the review so as not to spoil it but be forewarned, I might not completely succeed in this.
Atonement is a story told in two acts (with a prologue bringing everything together). It starts by featuring the story of two well-to-do sisters, one 13 and the other several years older, living in England just before the outbreak of WWII. The younger of the two, Briony, witnesses events she’s not quite able to wrap her mind around and does the unthinkable: tells a lie that lands Robbie (the love of the older sister Cecilia) in jail.
The story then fast forwards four years. Robbie is out of jail, having been forced to fight in the war. Cecilia is a nurse in London, having disowned her family for their refusal to support Robbie. And Briony is beginning to feel the gravity of what she did. Having found each other again, Robbie is anxious to get back to his love (as is Cecilia!) and Briony struggles to make amends for her past actions.
As I said it ends with a prologue that ties everything together. Instead of a fast forward of just a few years, the story jumps about 40. And an elderly Briony is finally able to find some, however small, means of atoning for her actions.
I couldn’t help but like this film, primarily because of the themes it deals with (and the way in which it deals with them). It is a vivd exploration of the darker side of humanity — the side we all try to hide — and the quest for some semblance of reconciliation. Broadly, the power of words (written words, specifically) and their ability to create and destroy is toyed with. It’s in her words that Briony sins most notably and then its in her words that she’s able to find some since of atonement as well. The personal struggle and weight of sins also carried much of the second act and the accent on our darker emotions (jealousy, anger, lust, fear, etc) were able to bring forth in sense of urgency in the characters struggle for atonement.
One of the things I really enjoyed about this movie was the audio/visual clues that seem to hone in and reinforce the themes present. The percussive beat of a typewriter drives many (probably most) of the tense moments. And the movie starts with a play and it ends with a novel (both written struggles to understand complex emotions) and contains many written pieces throughout that seem to just highlight the struggle with and power of our word. And another visual clue that you could guarantee to highlight an important scene: the color red. Red is an interesting color — it highlights our sin, it highlights love and passion, and (for the spiritual) it also highlights the atoning work of blood. It’s used in all of these ways throughout the entirety of the film: the red wall in the library, blood flowing into the fountain, hospital curtain that surrounds Briony and the frenchman, the cape she wears throughout much of the second act, and the tulips in the closing scene. Truth be told, much color is washed out in the majority of the movie, but the color red almost never is. And there are other colors giving visual clues as well (Cecilia’s deep green dress vs the love/life she’s about to embrace, etc) the continued presence of red just jumps out though.
As to dislikes, I don’t think the story was developed quite well enough. This could just be my general ambivalence towards love stories in general but I didn’t feel that I was connecting strongly enough with Cecilia and Robbie. While I think a certain degree of disconnect between them and the audience was necessary to drive in the final moments, I still thought that their story could have been better developed. And the same goes for other pieces as well. Even though this film was quite long, several of the scenes felt a bit too rushed (entrance of Briony in the second act and the wedding seen immediately come to mind) and could have been further developed. All things said and done, thankfully none of this detracted greatly from the film overall.
And that brings me to the conclusion in which I say again that I really enjoyed Atonement and find it well worth seeing. As previously mentioned though, know that it is quite heavy and not exactly happy (or in some ways hopeful). Incidentally, the author of the novel (Ian McEwan) I regularly see lumped in with the so-called “new atheists.” As such don’t expect any particular Christian message. Outside of loose circumstances and symbolism you certainly won’t find any. But go with an interest in atonement and reconciliation and the power of our words and be open to the weight at which our sins weigh us down. And as the characters struggle to find some means of atonement within themselves and in their own actions, be thankful for the work that was done for us.
Jan 15, 2008 Comments
One of the highlights of Christmas vacation not mentioned in my last long post was getting through six different books. I imagine everyone reading this already knows, but if you didn’t — I love to read. And because I was so successful over the past couple of weeks, I’ll offer some mini-reviews, as most of the books I’d recommend. Without further ado, here they are (in no particular order):
Jim and Casper Go To Church — Jim and Casper chronicles the story of a Christian and an atheist visiting various prominent churches across the nation (nine total). Most of the churches you’ve likely heard of (Saddleback, Willow, Lakewood, etc) but a few are more obscure. What makes this an interesting read is that it details the thoughts of an atheist (Casper) as he witnesses examples of how Christians “do church”. The question he kept going back to, church after church, was “Would Jesus really do this?” I think it’s a good one to ask as we craft and fine tune our ecclesiologies. Another point I found interesting: Casper felt most mega-churches were devoid of any sense of community (even of a simple yet authentic greeting). This is certainly something to be mindful of (and has been one of the driving forces behind what I see as legitimate ecclesiology). This is something I might explore later though and not in this ever-so-brief review. All in all a quick and good read. Recommended particularly if you don’t mind an honest look at how we (evangelicals) tend to do things.
Jesus and Empire — Jesus and Empire reads as a history textbook — mostly pretty dry. It looks specifically at the historical Jesus, placing Him in the context of the Roman empire and examining specifically how Jesus critiqued empire. Honestly, two of the remaining books (you’ll be able to figure out which two) do a much better job at this. At least they kept my attention much better. Whereas this book seemed to hone in more on the history, the others seemed to do a much better job of honing in on Jesus. That being said, this book does make good points — I just wouldn’t jump it to the top of your reading list.
Poverty and Wealth in James — This tiny book is actually a very specific commentary on the book of James examining the passages that deal with (surprise, surprise) poverty and wealth. It is actually quite good and worthwhile if you are doing a study of James. Make sure you have a copy of the text of James in front of you though. And it doesn’t hurt to understand Greek.
The Myth of a Christian Nation — I think Myth might rate as the best book I read over break. It’s an honest assessment of the kingdom of the sword (any world government — take your pick) versus the kingdom of the cross. This is a book I’ll likely blog more about (both this one and the next one) so I’ll try to keep this review short. The point that jumped out most to me is that which sets up the rest of the book: the kingdom of the sword is always (and will always) be based on “power over” ideology. Regardless of whether we are talking about dictatorships, socialist states, democracies or democratic republics — they are all systems based on some holding power over others. In contrast, the kingdom of the cross is based on the ethic Jesus ushered in: sacrificial, servant leadership (to complete the contrast: “power under”). Of interest — Greg Boyd pulls heavily from the next book, The Politics of Jesus by John Howard Yoder. Read this first though as its much easier to understand.
The Politics of Jesus — As I previously said, Myth pulls heavily from Politics. This book is much more academic though and takes quite a bit more time to digest. Whereas the previous book looks specifically at the contrasting kingdoms, Politics seeks to lift a complete social ethic from the teachings of Jesus. Yoder succeeds in this respect, to be sure. This is one I look forward to exploring further soon.
The New Friars — The New Friars examines emerging monastic movements across the globe and how we can get involved in them. I’ll be honest — I like reading this type of book; I find it very encouraging to see how God is moving (it tends to inspire to want to be involved in things that make my mom sweat though). If you are looking for an easy read that’ll give you real life examples of how God is moving in the world today, pick this one up. It’s worth it. (PS. It’s no Sub-Merged. Read that first. Incidentally it’s my top book of 2007.)
And there you have it — the books I read over break. As I said above, there are several that I hope to explore more in this space. And hopefully I’ll do that soon while they are still fresh. Until then…
Jan 13, 2008 Comments
Last week (Tuesday) I returned home from an extended vacation at my parent’s house. I left on Dec 20 and Tuesday was Jan 8 so 18 days, to be exact. While gone I took the time to not do much work (only little things for OU as well as some SEO stuff) and instead focused on relaxing, spending time with family and recharging the old batteries. While 18 days is long to be gone from home, there was lots of fun to be had there. I’ll try to detail some of that (since I was purposefully scarce here whilst gone).
It’s said that some of the best times happen around the dinner table. Well, I say that at least. And that seems to be one thing my family enjoys — fine food. Be it a small whole in the wall type joint or a much fancier feast, we enjoyed lots of good food together.
We also ate at many well known places along the way (the Crackhouse, Mimi’s Cafe, etc) and other unknown ones (LaFawnda’s, my dad’s favorite calzone place which isn’t actually as good as he thinks it is, some random joint in Tombstone, etc). The highlighted ones above though are the meals that stick out in my mind.
With any family trip, at least in my family, you never quite know what all is going to happen and it never quite works out like you expect it to.
taurant (my burger was pretty good) and then headed out. Bisbee was much neater. It’s essentially a town in the mountains full of hippies. It’s quite quaint and had some really interesting shops. We all stopped for a coffee at a local shop and then headed to Tucson to meet my parents at the aforementioned El Charro’s. It was a perfect topper to the day.
Alright. There you have a basic rundown of my time in Arizona. I’ll post some pictures over the next few days too.